by Joseph Gyourko, Christopher Mayer, and Todd Sinai. Reading for Tuesday, 31 July.
Differences in house price and income growth rates between 1950 and 2000 across metropolitan areas have led to an ever-widening gap in housing values and incomes between the typical and highest-priced locations. We show that the growing spatial skewness in house prices and incomes are related and can be explained, at least in part, by inelastic supply of land in some attractive locations combined with an increasing number of high-income households nationally. Scarce land leads to a bidding-up of land prices and a sorting of high-income families relatively more into those desirable, unique, low housing construction markets, which we label “superstar cities.” Continued growth in the number of high-income families in the
Published: Thursday, July 26, 2007
To print this page, select "Print" from the File menu of your browser.
© 2013. The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use / Privacy Policy